• Tb0n3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    Second amendment means we should have anti-aircraft missiles too. This is not a joke. I am serious.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      Honestly, even if it were legal, who would be able to afford it? It’d just mean the ultra wealthy would have even more powerful private armies. A single missile costs at least a few hundred thousand dollars, with some systems costing millions per missile. Which is unfathomably expensive when you think of what you can buy with a few million dollars.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Afraid of the increasing missile street violence? Call now and buy your own handheld missile launcher today at 50% discount. The best way to stop a bad guy with a missile launcher is a good guy with a missile launcher.

      • @Udonezo
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        This is what organized militias are for. Crowdfunding and rigourous oversight

      • Tb0n3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -41 year ago

        The free market is very good at reducing prices. Do you really think the price the government pays for missiles is reasonable?

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Anti-aircraft missiles, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear SAMs, shall not be infringed.

    • @dylanTheDeveloper
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Shadow wizard money gang (we love casting spells) LEGALISE NUCLEAR BOMBS