Video games also have potential legal advantages over IQ tests for companies. You could argue that “we only hire people good at video games to get people who fit our corporate culture of liking video games” but that argument doesn’t work as well for IQ tests.

yet again an original post title that self-sneers

  • @mind
    link
    English
    -31 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • PJ Coffey
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      @mind @dgerard

      IQ tests assume that there is a general intelligence that they’re measuring. That has never been found and if it _had_ then it would be compulsory learning at school.

      IQ tests are pretty good for measuring low attainment and problems, that’s what they were designed for.

      • @mind
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      you know what, I’ll bite

      “just for kicks” I’ve run IQ tests at various times in my life, in various states of being (stressed, sick, tired, etc)

      the variance I got on the outputs have been up to 40 points wide across many cases.

      objective measure it is not.

      proxy indicator, very much so.

      the shit does not measure what you think it does.

      • 🆘Bill Cole 🇺🇦
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        @froztbyte @sneerclub Data point: at one time as a kid it occurred to a school counselor that maybe my grades were evidence that my supposed “potential” based on an earlier IQ test was wrong & that a new more modern version of the Stanford-Binet would reveal my imbecility. The 2nd test came out 60+ points higher than the 1st. That couldn’t be correct, so I ended up taking 2 more tests, both with scores in between but substantially different.
        Sure, IQ is real.

      • @mind
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        deleted by creator