• @Reliant1087
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is super interesting. But why isn’t HTML or CSS a similar mess? I found their structure to be more logical than JS. Parts of JS feels like it’s intended as a backend language but parts of it don’t.

    • fkn
      link
      21 year ago

      Wait, you don’t think html is a mess? Lol.

      Css benefited from coming much later than the other two… But it also has issues.

      • @Reliant1087
        link
        11 year ago

        I mean semantic html seems like a pretty okay markup language.

        • fkn
          link
          11 year ago

          Lol. That’s like saying js is ok as long as you never use the parts that 90% of js developers use.

          • @Reliant1087
            link
            11 year ago

            Really? I find that css is pretty much the ugly part of html. Html is no worse than markdown or latex. If you just wrote plain HTML and were okay with how it rendered, you would have nicely structured code.

            • fkn
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My point is that if you only use the parts that don’t bring confusion you have a problem… Nobody ever does that in production… Much less with any frameworks. There is no such thing as semantic html at scale or in any modern framework.

              • @Reliant1087
                link
                11 year ago

                That isn’t the fault of the language though. It does what it was designed to well. Maybe it is I’ll suited to achieve things it wasn’t designed to do?

                I could absolutely write code to do data analytics with C and gnuplot, does that mean they’re the appropriate tools for doing that when pandas, SPSS, Julia or matlab exists? Probably not.

                • fkn
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Maybe I misunderstood your position. It seems like you are now saying you understand how html messy?