OK, but it sure dampens the impact of what CNN was saying there.
Going from “he kept going on and on about how X was trying to take him out, but he could never prove it” directly to “fortunately, X was able to take him out” in the very next sentence is… an odd choice.
It’s an odd choice, but it’s factually correct. He didn’t have evidence before, but he sure as hell does now.
Of course, nobody with a brain needed evidence, considering the long history of the CIA doing exactly that everywhere else in Latin America. But liberal media has never been quick to call out the government or their fascist tendencies.
OK, but it sure dampens the impact of what CNN was saying there.
Going from “he kept going on and on about how X was trying to take him out, but he could never prove it” directly to “fortunately, X was able to take him out” in the very next sentence is… an odd choice.
It’s an odd choice, but it’s factually correct. He didn’t have evidence before, but he sure as hell does now.
Of course, nobody with a brain needed evidence, considering the long history of the CIA doing exactly that everywhere else in Latin America. But liberal media has never been quick to call out the government or their fascist tendencies.