• ramenshamanBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    SpaceX is actually really fucking successful, why would be destroy it by tainting it with shitty AI? Oh right, because he’s a moron who does way too much ketamine.

    • mech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      SpaceX has the US government by the balls, and several others, due to Starlink.
      Musk wants to leverage that by intertwining SpaceX with his other shitty businesses, to protect them as well.

    • floppybiscuits
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m assuming you mean operationally but not financially? They wouldn’t have to raise capital so much if it were financially so…

      • ramenshamanBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m using the success rate of the Falcon 9 rocket and how many launches they do as my metrics. If they’re not doing well financially then they’re making some questionable financial decisions.

        • BioMan@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          I mean Starship is a VERY questionable financial decision the way they are running it. The falcon program is another matter. It’s actually remarkable how the two of them are almost diametrically opposed in how they are run.

          • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            @BioMan Falcon 9 launches are reportedly sold for $60-80M (or $160-200M for Falcon Heavy). But an F9 launch in Starlink configuration is billed internally at just $12M, for the same payload as a Saturn 1B. Which is just insane (S1B cost $55M per flight in 1972, or $425M today).

        • rook@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Remember there’s the bit of spacex that runs a successful commercial rocketry program, but also the bit of spacex that keeps blowing up stupid giant rockets.

          All of musk’s companies have to support one of his idiotic pet projects… tesla got the cybertruck, x got grok, spacex got starship. None of them can be stopped, because they’re his and he’s personally invested in them. His flunkeys can only make questionable financial decisions around those projects, because he will fire them if they don’t.

          Tesla is struggling and is trying to sidestep into humanoid robotics (a different kind of stupid idea), x was always a money sink, and now elon is concerned that his ai waifu might die without an injection of sweet government cash. It isn’t clear he’s capable of giving a shit about the consequences of any of this.

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Spacex, walking the path of something solved literally 4 decades ago: blows up many rockets

          Yeah, super successful. As a grift of course, because that’s what it is