• dejected_warp_core
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Another tact is to insure the police. There was an NPR journal on that a long time ago and it worked wonders where a police department was basically the gang that couldn’t shoot straight, running up all kinds of crazy legal fees for the city. Insurance compliance drove 100% of the needed departmental changes in a way that kept behavior, budget, and the city council in check. In exchange, the insurance policy was there for any mishaps or gross mistakes that would require a payout of any kind.

    Foisting change politically by top-down policy was woefully ineffective in comparison. While this doesn’t fix the underlying problems with qualified immunity and how the cops can still fuck up anyone’s day on a whim, this does help.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      so now you’re paying a private entity in this round about bullshit way for a service that isn’t actually the service you want but the service you want kinda is a side hustle for them in order to bring down their costs

      insurance may be the way forward because the situation is so far beyond fucked it’s incredible

      … but insurance shouldn’t be the answer

      just make the insurance compliance stuff law and also make sure to add that if the rules aren’t followed you’re on your own

      • dejected_warp_core
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh, I agree. It’s perverse that the most effective way to govern is to outsource parts of it. It’s dangerous in other ways, but I will say that insurance companies can usually be relied upon to be greedy in ways that are advantageous in this particular scheme.