cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7672208
cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/28620
Democratic voters overwhelmingly want a leader who will fight the superrich and corporate America, and they believe Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the person to do it, according to a poll released this week.
While Democrats are often portrayed as squabbling and directionless, the poll conducted last month by the New Republic with Embold Research demonstrated a remarkable unity among the more than 2,400 Democratic voters it surveyed.
This was true with respect to policy: More than 9 in 10 want to raise taxes on corporations and on the wealthiest Americans, while more than three-quarters want to break up tech monopolies and believe the government should conduct stronger oversight of business.
But it was also reflected in sentiments that a more confrontational governing philosophy should prevail and general agreement that the party in its current form is not doing enough to take on its enemies.
Three-quarters said they wanted Democrats to “be more aggressive in calling out Republicans,” while nearly 7 in 10 said it was appropriate to describe their party as “weak.”
This appears to have translated to support for a more muscular view of government. Where the label once helped to sink Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) two runs for president, nearly three-quarters of Democrats now say they are either unconcerned with the label of “socialist” or view it as an asset.
Meanwhile, 46% said they want to see a “progressive” at the top of the Democratic ticket in 2028, higher than the number who said they wanted a “liberal” or a “moderate.”
It’s an environment that appears to be fertile ground for Ocasio-Cortez, who pitched her vision for a “working-class-centered politics” at this week’s Munich summit in what many suspected was a soft-launch of her presidential candidacy in 2028.
With 85% favorability, Bronx congresswoman had the highest approval rating of any Democratic figure in the country among the voters surveyed.
It’s a higher mark than either of the figures who head-to-head polls have shown to be presumptive favorites for the nomination: Former Vice President Kamala Harris and California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Early polls show AOC lagging considerably behind these top two. However, there are signs in the New Republic’s poll that may give her supporters cause for hope.
While Harris is also well-liked, 66% of Democrats surveyed said they believe she’s “had her shot” at the presidency and should not run again after losing to President Donald Trump in 2024.
Newsom does not have a similar electoral history holding him back and is riding high from the passage of Proposition 50, which will allow Democrats to add potentially five more US House seats this November.
But his policy approach may prove an ill fit at a time when Democrats overwhelmingly say their party is “too timid” about taxing the rich and corporations and taking on tech oligarchs.
As labor unions in California have pushed for a popular proposal to introduce a billionaire’s tax, Newsom has made himself the chiseled face of the resistance to this idea, joining with right-wing Silicon Valley barons in an aggressive campaign to kill it.
While polls can tell us little two years out about what voters will do in 2028, New Republic editorial director Emily Cooke said her magazine’s survey shows an unmistakable pattern.
“It’s impossible to come away from these results without concluding that economic populism is a winning message for loyal Democrats,” she wrote. “This was true across those who identify as liberals, moderates, or progressives: An unmistakable majority wants a party that will fight harder against the corporations and rich people they see as responsible for keeping them down.”
From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.




Stop lying
That’s the worst part, she sent money to Israel all for the love of the game. They didn’t even bribe her 🤣
This tracker doesn’t endorse anyone who votes pro Israel. Nice try heritage foundation
Are you actually trying to deny that AOC has funded Israel? This was a whole thing just a few months ago and she even crashed out on Twitter over it. Not my fault you live under a rock.
Not impressed with your purity test because I trust track AIPAC. I also think she is a lot cleaner and braver than 98% of congress so bashing her really doesn’t make a ton of sense in the situation we find ourselves in. Washington is essentially occupied by Israel. Ghisline and Epstein were Mossad and most of congress is compromised so I think in the situation we find ourselves in someone who doesn’t take Israeli money and has voted to block aid on several occasions is counterproductive. Do you have a source?
Hmm… I wonder where AOC works…
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-defends-decision-support-military-aid-israel
There are a limited few in Washington fighting against Israel. It looks like she voted for the weaponizing of the term antisemitism several times too. Yea that sucks. I hope she learned a lesson but who knows. She’s still far better than most because she has voted to block arms against Israel on other occasions https://electronicintifada.net/content/aoc-votes-back-israel-lobbys-bogus-anti-semitism-definition/50066
At least link a source or something. AOC has been, to my knowledge, one of the most outspoken people against the genocide.
deleted by creator
Americans got so brainwashed they think if a politician says something then it’s true. I judge her based on her actions.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-defends-decision-support-military-aid-israel
Even just going off words, she is certainly not one of the most outspoken people on this topic. She’s more outspoken than her Democrat colleagues but the bar is in hell if that’s our standard.
I do think it’s worth noting that the vote in question was for funding for their Iron Dome missile defense system.
I’m not defending her vote, but there is a difference between defensive capabilities over civilian airspace, and offensive munitions being used to murder civilians.
Not defending her, but I do think it’s an important distinction.
No, it really isn’t. It’s the equivalent of sending anti air guns to Nazi Germany
It’s not an important distinction at all. It’s the equivalent of donating a bullet-proof vest to a serial killer.
It is different. Defensive money is not the same as offensive money.
Also one of those people commenting has a brand new account. I mentioned it and my comment was deleted.
Stay vigilant for fake accounts. AOC is the least corrupt potential candidate. And she’s not even a Dem. She’s an independent. The attacks on her are going to continue to ramp up from the opposition. Which includes corp Dems, Republicans, and aipac affiliations.
Lemmy is a growing community and there is nothing suspicious about someone being new here. This is just a sad defence mechanism you developed from your days on Reddit.
She’s made public statements she’s against funding Israel genocide. Just the other day in munich she said this again.
She’s never voted to send money to Israel.
She did vote against an amendment that would have cut funds for the iron dome a while back. It was among some 2 part chess amendment or something, there was another vote about a different package related to that, but it made no sense to vote against that besides claiming “it’s a defense fund, totally different, surely it won’t be used as part of the genocide”.
I’m not taking that to claim she’s pro Israel or pro genocide, but it was irritating at the time.
Also, generally speaking, remember to take what politicians claim as separate from what they actually vote for. Don’t take their public statements as evidence.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-defends-decision-support-military-aid-israel
This is super embarrassing for you lol
She voted against an amendment to reduce dome funding , that had other changes too
One example. And it was defensive funding.
I still don’t like it. But it’s not the blatant Israel genocide support you claim it to be.
Can you name any other politician that has always voted against Israel funding. ?
AOC has the best track record, even if it’s not as perfect as I would like.
At least she didn’t vote to send offensive weapons or other funding to Israel.
Isn’t that what this argument is about? She’s not perfect on the stance, has voted to fund the Iron Dome and voted to increase police funding in Washington DC, but shes worth settling on. Not sure about most the other elected Democrats.
I mean, that’s what I was saying. But the other person seemed to think this ment she was pro genocide.