FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 days agoLet the alliance of democracy hold strongmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1612arrow-down116file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]neoliberal[email protected]
arrow-up1596arrow-down1imageLet the alliance of democracy hold strongmedia.piefed.socialFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square50linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]neoliberal[email protected]
cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/noncredibledefense/p/1592996/let-the-alliance-of-democracy-hold-strong
minus-squaresbrodolino21linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days ago“Security would be monitred by Russia and China” means that it would be monitored by the country who’s just invaded you and its ally which means capitulation.
minus-squareMatty Roses@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoAgain, if you want to say it’s a bad deal,it’s a different argument. Russia wasn’t demanding territory,and that’s what the poster was claiming.
“Security would be monitred by Russia and China” means that it would be monitored by the country who’s just invaded you and its ally which means capitulation.
Again, if you want to say it’s a bad deal,it’s a different argument. Russia wasn’t demanding territory,and that’s what the poster was claiming.