The world is afraid to flex its muscle. An international canopy of objecters to the regime in control of Iran must unite and take definitive action. The final war must occur.

Likely war with Iran will draw in Russia. Iran will be supported by China, though they would not become boots-on-the-ground involved.

The war against Russia must occur. The leader known as Putin must be eliminated. He cannot afford to win a war on two fronts.

This will require added pressure in Ukraine. Then the clean sweep of Iran, which should not include civilian targets, should run its course.

There will be some kind of battle upon its horizons, the Russian border, which is friendly Turkenistan. Perhaps Azerbaijan. Which will be swift victories.

Then will come regime change in Iran. Out battle will commence. We must not allow the victor to be friendly to the caliphate. They must be crushed. A full Iranian revolution will then commence.

When the winner is decided, they must immediately be greeted by American representatives. They must be convenient and subservient to American needs. But not fully corrupted by our power.

The last stage will require economic infusement. The new ruling power will require our support, which we must provide. The Iranian people are a great people, and an ancient people, who deserve our guidance and remission—we must allow their own people to decide (provided they are progressive to an agreeable extent) the future of their own lands.

  • mrdown
    21·
    10 days ago

    1- The OP did not mention congress

    2- Vietnam war was approved by the congress. Did You support that war of aggression where your terrorists killed over a millions Vietnamese?

    3 - From an international perspective a revolt against a regime is internal affairs. Neither Nato and usa has the right to intervene

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineEnglish
      12·
      10 days ago

      1. I mentioned Congress because the ability to go to war is an exclusive right of the US Congress.

      2. The Vietnam War started as an admirable cause started by the French, to stop the dictatorship from taking power, but very early on it was clear that we lost and then idiots dragged the war on for a decade.

      3. To prevent widespread death and suffering is cause to intervene, thats like the founding charter of the UN. Countries should have already intervened in Israel because they have ample justification, but apparently equal apathy.

      • mrdown
        12·
        10 days ago

        Revolts are internal affairs the Principle of Non-Intervention is in the UN Charter (Article 2(7)).

        The Vietnam war did not start with an admirable cause you are a fool for thinking that.

        Israel is doing a genocide yet the USA is protecting Israelis over the Palestinians who are the occupied and victim of settler colonialism same with the other hypocritical western allies of the United Snaked

        France’s objective was to re-establish the Indochina Union to exploit Vietnam’s rubber, tin, and rice resources. American motivation was to suppress an economical system that they disagree with.

        You should be ashamed of justifying the Vietnam war in any shape and form