• ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        104
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Work stuff should be on a work phone.

        I don’t understand why either the worker or the company would ever allow the use of personal devices for work.

            • bonenode@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              They can also just let you go for someone else who has no clue about this and gladly would use their private phone for work. Depends on the job and company, of course.

              • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s dangerous thinking; “if I don’t then someone else will.” That’s a common excuse that thieves use. And it’s you doing the work of your oppressor.

                Standing up for what you believe in isn’t always easy, but it’s always the right choice.

        • KiwiTB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because they are cheap and their tech lead is probably incompetent.

          • Pope-King Joe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is Walmart in a nutshell. A majority of the work phones at my store (used for stuff like inventory management) are Samsung Galaxy XCover Pros from like 2016. They were trash the day they released and they’re especially trash now. The company is very slowly replacing them with Pixel 8s (like one every six months comes in). It is legitimately frustrating.

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          my work pays my cell phone bill if I install Microsoft teams, and frankly that’s a pretty good deal

          • Railcar8095
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            With that money, get a second one and it’s it only during work ours. Doesn’t even need connection, use WiFi of tethering.

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              that sounds annoying. I’d rather just have it all on the same device. I can enable and disable work apps on a schedule if I’m bothered. I don’t want to deal with two devices really

              • Turret3857@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                If youre in the US and your company is paying your phone bill, they are legally allowed to access your location via cell towers at any given moment. That, in combination with the fact that they can also legally take the phone from you (You have company trade secrets on that device if you install their software), I dont see the point in risking not having a 2nd device.

                • cole@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  you’re gonna have to cite some sources here because I don’t think there is actually a legal requirement for these things.

                  the work apps require Internet access to even open and the contents are encrypted. this has all been figured out

                  • Turret3857@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    Legitimate Reasons for Employer Device Access There are valid reasons why an employer might need to access an employee’s phone, regardless of ownership: Legal Compliance: To comply with legal requests such as subpoenas or investigations. Security Breaches: To investigate potential security breaches or data leaks. Violation of Company Policy: To investigate violations of company policies regarding acceptable use. Employee Termination: Upon termination, to retrieve company data and ensure a smooth transition.

                    https://www.aeanet.org/can-an-employer-take-your-phone/#Can_an_Employer_Take_Your_Phone_Exploring_Workplace_Device_Confiscation

                    Let’s be generous and say your employer considers your phone a personal device even though they pay for the service.

                    For an employer to legally track a personal phone’s location, they need explicit consent from the employee and must have narrowly defined policies.

                    https://legalclarity.org/can-my-employer-track-my-work-phone-location/

                    Is there anything stopping them from hiding a tracking policy in your contract? Did you fully read the contract to check? Would allowing them to pay for the service count as consent in court? IANAL, but why would you risk it, when you could just have a work phone you only use for work.

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              yeah but you can disable most of it’s invasive permissions so I’m ok with it

          • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            What happens if the worker doesn’t have a smartphone, or has one, it breaks and they don’t have money to buy another for while, or what if they install a random app that encrypts their mailbox?

            Even if you live in a 3rd world country where employers can force it, it’s a stupid decision for the business.

            • zelahdieliekeis@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t understand your line of questioning. If a bad thing happens then a bad thing happens. Potential for bad things indeed makes companies likely to lock down devices if they provide them, hence the qualifier “not all works would allow it.” From an employee perspective, if you have the freedom to do it then more secure OS is more secure.

              • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I have a work phone.

                If didn’t have a personal phone, it wouldn’t matter.

                If it breaks, they have insurance to replace it immediately.

                There’s no risk it will stop working because I didn’t pay the bill.

                And I can’t install random crap because it’s locked down.

                And they have options like remotely wipe the device, if they think something weird is happening.

                From my side. The phone is turned off the microsecond I clock out.

            • bajabound
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I can tell you what we do. Here’s your yubikey. Then most find a new phone after a couple weeks.

        • Ghoelian@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not necessarily. Microsoft’s authenticator has an option where you have to tap a notification to approve, which isn’t a standard TOTP thing. If your company requires that version of MFA, you pretty much have to use Microsoft’s authenticator.

          • Lets_Disco@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Aw shit, this sucks because my company uses this authentication method.

            I guess when the change finally happens I’ll just be saying ‘you owe me a phone for this’. Absolutely no way i am going back to Android just for this on my personal phone.

            One possible workaround is to add more options to your security info in your work account. For example, I added my number and also a specific password as an option last year when I moved onto Graphene and had to update that info. Would that be an option?

            Unsure if that would even work or if those options are more for account recovery (when no longer have access to a specific device)

              • Lets_Disco@retrolemmy.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah, this is what might be the final outcome

                If i say give me a phone and they say “no, come into the office instead of working from home”, I will produce an old phone faster than ya ckuld blink lol

      • Fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Old phone with remote desktop.

        Works like a charm for many of these types of things. You can also forward notifications into NTFY or Matrix.

      • ItsMyVault101@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        MS MFA allows to use a different Authenticator App. On the step called “Start by getting the app” you just need to press the blue text above the “next” button which spells “I want to use a different authenticator app”, there you can use whatever you prefer, even WinAuth works with this method.

      • KiwiTB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        So does mine, and Oracle… But that just means no slop installed

          • quick_snail@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Is that money enough to buy a phone? If not, they’re not paying you enough for that.

            If so, then you should actually spend that money on what it’s meant for

        • Railcar8095
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not sure about this one, but many don’t expose the key used to generate the codes, it’s linked to your user.

          So it’s not trivial/possible to use a FOSS alternative.

          This happens with okta too.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          No MS authenticator also requires internet and gives saysbis this you. Also requires a number.

      • excursion22@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can use a different authenticator with M$ accounts. Just choose to set up with a different app. Aegis is nice.

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Great, so you have nothing to worry about, unless your Graphene phone is rooted. (Which would defeat the entire point)

        The article is shit. Microsoft is not blocking any GrapheneOS. It is only blocking rooted phones.

        • Stez@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          “root detection” is not actually detecting root as that is very difficult it’s detecting an unlocked bootloader or modified software that didn’t come on your phone(like a custom rom such as graphene os)

      • IggyTheSmidge@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do they mandate the use of MS Authenticator specifically, though?

        The option to add that restriction is definitely there, but it’s worth checking your account settings to see if it’ll let you use a different MFA option.