• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Considering how there’s almost no computers anymore with such limited resources that they can’t store a string or convert to one, it’s kind of crazy anybody bothers with the ambiguity of using numbers for the month.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        The limited resource is not Compute Power, but Engineer time. Sure, you could ask someone to implement wrappers everywhere in the system so that the display is human-readable - or you could put one label somewhere clarifying the date format to readers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Implement wrappers everywhere? Why can’t they just write a single function that takes an ISO date a spits out a string (human readable) date? I’d put money down that such a function already exists in almost every library that deals with dates.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            That’s why I said “implement” and not just “write”. The process of wiring in that existing function has non-negligible cost, as does keeping it updated/patched.

            Sure, it should be pretty small - but it’s non-zero. Is it worth it? That’s a product decision.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Yes spreadsheet apps like excel do this. If I remember correctly MMMM would write the full month. January.

      • @aceshigh
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        i just write mmmmmmm because you can never have too many m’s.