• SlurpingPus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    The pricier the clothes, the more invisible the logos are.

    • wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not necessarily true. Some of the most expensive brands are all about showing the brand off as a sign of wealth and exclusivity. See: LV, chanel, Gucci as obvious examples, Ferrari, Tag, Hermes, Dior, so on as less obvious but still very brand forward.

      Companies love using people as walking ads. You even pay them to do it instead of the other way around. It’s genius but sad.

      • SlurpingPus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        I think those are mid-rich brands. Meanwhile someone like Zuckerberg is wearing t-shirts of a brand of which no one here has heard.

        • wia@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Pretty sure those are just cucinelli. Not that expensive in the grand scheme of quality clothing. Ridiculous for the average person unless you care that much about having high quality clothes, but only about $300.

          Though there are better values for quality out there like maybe kiton or LP. None of these are the style to be like brand forward. More meant to be staple low mental effort stuff then statement pieces.