• Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I was one of those oil companies, I’d say sure. You staff the tanker with your people and you insure us for any losses incurred. Also, put an upfront amount of insurance money in escrow.

    But we’re not risking lives, merchandise, and equipment. You want the oil that badly. You move it. We’re just going to raise oil prices to cover our losses in the meantime, so we’re fine.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh they tried this, admin offered to pay oil companies for damages and move it themselves. Little catch there is tanker ships take half a decade or longer to build. The companies cannot afford to roll the dice on losing one, even if they’ll get reimbursed for the ship. They lose capacity ($$$) waiting for the replacement.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, losses would wouldn’t just be the cargo and the ship, it would be a decade long hit to earnings. And I’d want to see money for all of that, in escrow, before I moved an inch. Trump is famous for not paying his debts. I’d want all that money secured upfront.

    • TehWorld
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not just normal insurance cost either. These ships take years to replace. They also have to insure against the multiple years worth of profits and loss of market share.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly. It’s the ship, the goods, the lost earning over many years, severance for staff that won’t be used, etc. It would be mess.

        I also wonder how clean up for a spill would be handled. Currently that’s managed by Iran and the vessel that spilled pays.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Also, if they sink in a bad spot, they’ll physically block the strait. It’s a narrow corridor that’s navigable.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of course. The US government would have to insure it. No private company is touching that with a 10 foot pole.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          No company is going to trust insurance from this administration though. That’s the problem with having a Trump who famously never pays his debts.

          • Ghostalmedia
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            Which is why I said insurance in escrow.

            Trump is famous for stiffing people. I’d want that money paid upfront and held in escrow by an independent financial firm in a neutral nation.

            If a ship gets hit, escrow pays out for the oil, the ship, and the loss of future earnings. If the ships never sink, the money goes back to the US.