Global heating could become “catastrophic” for humanity if temperature rises are worse than many predict or cause cascades of events we have yet to consider, or indeed both.
It’s hilarious that the example for the definition of the word Catastrophic is also proving you wrong.
Or are you trying to argue that if it doesn’t happen at exactly the end of the century that the destruction of our species doesn’t matter?
Here was your original statement:
Also, greenhouse gases are primarily emitted into the lower atmosphere, not the stratosphere
Your own source states that the stratosphere is part of the lower atmosphere. Thanks for proving my point for me and again showing everyone that you either don’t know what you’re talking about or you’re a fossil fuel shill spreading their misinformation trying to downplay climate change.
I’ll just share the first line:
Definition of Catastrophic adjective US /ˌkæt̬.əˈstrɑː.fɪk/ UK /ˌkæt.əˈstrɒf.ɪk/: causing sudden and very great harm or destruction: An unchecked increase in the use of fossil fuels could have catastrophic results for the planet.
It’s hilarious that the example for the definition of the word Catastrophic is also proving you wrong.
Or are you trying to argue that if it doesn’t happen at exactly the end of the century that the destruction of our species doesn’t matter?
Here was your original statement:
Your own source states that the stratosphere is part of the lower atmosphere. Thanks for proving my point for me and again showing everyone that you either don’t know what you’re talking about or you’re a fossil fuel shill spreading their misinformation trying to downplay climate change.