• kurwa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is that retirement money? Because that’s what was stated above.

    • Sludgeyy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      “Allow her to retire comfortably” is what was stated above.

      The debatable part is if they meant immediately retire. If she saves it for retirement then it is “retirement money”

      But will it allow her to retire eventually comfortably?

      10 year US bond is 4.2%

      Let’s say she is 30.

      Retirement age is 67. So 37 years until retirement.

      6,000€ ×5 is ~$35,000

      $35,000 at 4.2% interest for 37 years is $160,388.66 (This isn’t taking into consideration reinvesting the 4.2% interest after 10 years, but also ignoring things like taxes)

      But getting $160k when you retire would allow a lot of people to retire comfortably.

      • wavebeam
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That’s like 4 years of income at a poverty level…

        • Sludgeyy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Having 160k + Regular retirement > Regular retirement

          • wavebeam
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            lol this happened in america, assuming they’ve got retirement lined up at all is a bit of a stretch

        • kurwa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah so not retirement money lol