• SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      Thanks for the information but jeez that makes me feel uncomfortable for some reason.

      • @candybrie
        link
        81 year ago

        It’s like the unclosed paren (but correct (craziness).

        • @sgtlighttree
          link
          31 year ago

          I’ve never seen this, but maybe since sentences with a parenthesis in it very rarely get a line break in the middle?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It is rather common in books, where you often see direct speech spanning multiple paragraphs.

            Edit: sorry, I misinterpeted/misread the comment. I’ve never seen the double parentheses thing either

            • @thrawn
              link
              51 year ago

              The quotation mark one is common in books yeah, but the parentheses one referred to by the comment you responded to isn’t. I haven’t seen that one either.

      • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        Being a programmer finally won out over my writing background. For example, I know the rule in the US is to include punctuation inside the quotation marks, but I just can’t do it anymore if the punctuation mark is not actually part of the quote. “The British do it right, in my opinion”.

    • Nora
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      As a native English speaker I feel like I get a say in this. This is the worst rule I’ve seen proposed. Unbalanced quotation marks are confusing as hell.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        While we’re at it, putting punctuation inside quotation marks when it’s not actually part of the quote also needs to be fixed. And the whole he/she thing.

    • @sgtlighttree
      link
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      YES! I’ve seen this formatting a lot in published books but never on the internet.