Daniel Tocci's attorney had previously argued that the case should be dismissed because “all the evidence" stemmed from his Capitol siege case.

Daniel Tocci’s attorney had previously argued that the case should be dismissed because “all the evidence" stemmed from his Capitol siege case.

  • EmpathicVagrant
    2·
    5 hours ago

    That’s what the second part dismisses with explanation, I believe the why was simply rhetorical to respond to the thought.