One of the biggest problems that we have today when it comes to energy production (and a whole lot of other things) is putting all our eggs in one basket. Well how the fuck does this change anything?
I am not anti-nuclear, but dumping ALL renewable targets is moronic. Now you’ve simply replaced one egg for another egg, but it’s still just ONE egg. A stable energy portfolio is diversifying your sources.
Yes it does? That’s what the article is about. They had a goal of 100% renewable energy, but they’ve scrapped that target, and are to build 10 new nuclear reactors because they’ve realized they won’t be able to produce enough electricity with purely renewables in time. Most of this is in the first paragraph.
One of the biggest problems that we have today when it comes to energy production (and a whole lot of other things) is putting all our eggs in one basket. Well how the fuck does this change anything?
I am not anti-nuclear, but dumping ALL renewable targets is moronic. Now you’ve simply replaced one egg for another egg, but it’s still just ONE egg. A stable energy portfolio is diversifying your sources.
The article doesn’t say if they intend to have 100% nuclear or if they dropped the target of 100% renewable to have a mix with more nuclear
Great observation 👍 could well be a misleading title
Yes it does? That’s what the article is about. They had a goal of 100% renewable energy, but they’ve scrapped that target, and are to build 10 new nuclear reactors because they’ve realized they won’t be able to produce enough electricity with purely renewables in time. Most of this is in the first paragraph.