I really dislike ad driven publications. I’m not opposed to paying for quality news publication, but for something like NYT, there’s only a couple articles a month I come across that I’m really interested in reading. There problem is that there’s 4-5 other paywalled publications where I have that same issue. I’m interested in their content, I just can’t justify the subscription price for the small amount of content from them I’ll actually consume, and I really can’t justify paying subscriptions for 4-5 publications at once.

I would pay $5-10 a month for a news aggregator for paywalled publications. It could be set up in a way that the publications get paid per view of their articles, it could be opened up to independent writers as well (e.g. integrate your substack with it). Maybe even an additional fee that includes digital magazine publications as well.

I can’t imagine it would be worse for the industry (unlike Spotify), as it already seems like journalism/news is hovering above collapse. They would be making money off of people who weren’t providing revenue previously.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Mostly… the advertising is disguised as top 10 articles with Amazon links. 50% journalism 40% articles 10% Reddit copied BuzzFeed “articles”

    • @drcarrot
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      I feel like 50% journalism is pretty good these days

    • @jeanofthedead
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      And it’s easy as pie to block those channels.

    • @qooqie
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      I guess that’s true, but I’m not one to ever click on buzz feed articles and they are usually quite clearly marked