ohshit604@sh.itjust.worksM to Canadian Firearms Rights@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 6 months ago"The Canadian Shield podcast on Nathalie Provost recent "unhinged rant" against Conservatives and the media, and one reason why he believes millions of Canadian gun owners rejected the Liberals"files.halstead.hostvideomessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down15
arrow-up1-2arrow-down1video"The Canadian Shield podcast on Nathalie Provost recent "unhinged rant" against Conservatives and the media, and one reason why he believes millions of Canadian gun owners rejected the Liberals"files.halstead.hostohshit604@sh.itjust.worksM to Canadian Firearms Rights@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square6linkfedilink
minus-squareT00l_shedlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·6 months agoPublic servant speaking about an issue that affected her directly isn’t unhinged.
minus-squareohshit604@sh.itjust.worksOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-26 months agoAFAICT it seems she’s violating s1.9 of the rules ministers must uphold. using your position to influence a decision to further private interests (s. 9) If our secretary of nature wasn’t also a spokesperson for PolySeSouvient, a known anti-gun organization, then she may have a leg to stand on in this regard.
minus-squareT00l_shedlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoEvery politician ever. Also, the decision was already made before, so no she’s not influencing as you suggest
Public servant speaking about an issue that affected her directly isn’t unhinged.
AFAICT it seems she’s violating s1.9 of the rules ministers must uphold.
If our secretary of nature wasn’t also a spokesperson for PolySeSouvient, a known anti-gun organization, then she may have a leg to stand on in this regard.
Every politician ever. Also, the decision was already made before, so no she’s not influencing as you suggest