• pitninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    For sure, hands are generally getting better, but they are still a persistent problem. Mostly you need a prompter who isn’t lazy and is actually looking at the outputs.

    • GrossGhost
      link
      fedilink
      561 year ago

      That would require paying someone to work, which is what they want to eliminate with AI.

      • @2ez
        link
        81 year ago

        The AI checks the AI, it’s recursive and we’re part of the simulation.

        • shootwhatsmyname
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          And next year, the AI will check us due to being embedded into our minds. Can’t have any rogue humans

          • @2ez
            link
            11 year ago

            That’s how we reach singularity

      • pitninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Right, but the person who prompted this image exists right now and their job will exist for the foreseeable future, so they need to not suck at their job until they’re no longer needed. I personally don’t see generative AI gaining the creative ability to define its own prompts in the near future, even if its generative outputs improve to the point where you don’t need an experienced prompter to ensure that hands aren’t deformed. Prompters are still going to be needed for highly specific prompts.