• x1gma
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    But these things fly and hit targets precisely. Now with jet engines too. Your dismissive tone is inappropriate in this case.

    Any 50 dollar drone from Amazon flies precisely too.

    https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/monthly-analysis-of-russian-shahed-136-deployment-against-ukraine

    No idea how credible that source is, it’s the first one I’ve found and the estimates seem plausible.

    Overall the hit rate is at its lowest point of 8.2%, shaheds specifically 12.66% in March 2026, steadily dropping, despite the launch volume increasing, which corresponds to the quality of the drones lacking in Russian production. The strike effectiveness is estimated at around 5%. That’s for a 48k$ production cost. So no, the dismissive tone is pretty much appropriate. It doesn’t seem that the Russian “customizations” are working out for them. Slapping a more powerful engine and a nearly doubled payload on a drone doesn’t make it more effective in some magical way. It runs out of spec, and is produced using an untrained workforce in some quickly rigged up factory.

    It’s a plain volume weapon used to saturate air defences, and the occasional hit is a nice to have. The only reason they still have a payload is because if they would only launch decoys Ukrainian air defences would avoid shooting at them at all.