• @Holyginz
    link
    English
    781 year ago

    I remember fondly playing overwatch 1 with my friends and sinking in hundreds of hours. If they wanted to break into the steam market they should have done it with the first one. Not with their lackluster, phoned in sequel. This was just stupid of them.

    • DarkGamer
      link
      fedilink
      731 year ago

      Let’s be real, Overwatch 2 was an update patch that they tried to sell as a sequel.

      • @Zalzabar
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        Lol when I first updated it the game didn’t replace my desktop icon so it was still saying overwatch 1 so yes just stupid patch that ruined a perfectly good game haven’t returned since

      • VanillaGorilla
        link
        fedilink
        -71 year ago

        I loved Assassin’s Creed 2, so I didn’t bat an eye buying Brotherhood and Revelations as they had the same basic background. They were full price games and I played for about 15 to 20 hours on each. That’s not much for full price. They were basically just new story lines for the main game.

          • VanillaGorilla
            link
            fedilink
            -61 year ago

            Sure, and I did. Multiple times. It’s just that the tower spin offs are too expensive. AC2 was about double the gaming for the same price.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Personally, I sometimes like when a game feels like just a new storyline (and map) for the same game. Sometimes I just want more of a good thing and don’t want to have to learn new mechanics or risk the game making things worse.

          And since dev time is limited, I think in theory, this could mean more time could be spent on making the story missions perfect. But in practice, I don’t think that usually happens. Publishers would rather cheap out.