• @conasatuta
    link
    English
    351 year ago

    A few years ago (when I commuted) I was driving in stop start traffic. I basically kept my car moving at tickover in 1st gear while the cars in from would pull about 8 car lengths ahead, stop, I’d creap up on them, then with luck traffic would start again and repeat. A chimp behind me couldn’t hack this and switched lane, passed me out then reentered my lane so they could get ahead of me and join the rest in stop and start routine

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is actually how you help cure traffic, as lots of the slow downs are due to lane changes. They cause stops, which ripple and persistent for hours.

      Enough people leaving a 3-4 car gap and not caring about people changing lanes in front of them turns “stop and go” into “go” in most traffic.

      Its also chill as fuck.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And saves gas. Too much over acceleration and sudden stopping will eat your tank supply. Coasting into a slow stop eases on the wasted gas due to over acceleration.

      • @Dozzi92
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        Unfortunately doesn’t work, but it’s definitely the way to make traffic a little easier to deal with, and a little easier on your car.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Definitely a good way to go, but it doesn’t really improve throughput. If that gap ahead of you means not getting through an intersection before the light changes, it just backs up traffic more. That’s worthwhile to me when you consider things like higher fuel efficiency/less wear to drive a consistent speed vs stop and go, lower chance of collisions since you’re allowing a greater following distance.

            It’s actually similar to the till line issue. When you have multiple tills open with multiple lines, you can get people through faster than having a single line that breaks out to multiple tills. People prefer the second case though because it feels like the line moves faster and it feels more fair because nobody has to be the one that ends up in a line moving slower than the rest. Traffic would probably flow better if more people just let themselves follow the flow instead of fighting for a good position, but the effort spent finding ways to advance through traffic makes people feel like they’re making more progress.

            • @Dozzi92
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Highway only, no lights. When lights are involved my principle is clear the intersection as efficiently and quickly as conditions allow.

        • @LengAwaits
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Please explain to me how it “doesn’t work”.

          My understanding is that an object already in motion requires less force (gas) to stay in motion, compared to bringing an object at rest into motion. Why else would they need to differentiate city vs highway MPG?

          Are you familiar with the concept of hypermiling? If not check it out!

          • @Dozzi92
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            It doesn’t work because nobody else does it. I’m stuck in traffic with a bajillion people and 99% of them either brake or gas, no coast. In some ideas scenario where everyone does it, sure, but in real life it’s a no go. But I still do it.

            Hypermiling is silly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      That’s what I do! Most people only look at the car directly in front of them, but it’s better to look a few cars ahead and observe how the traffic is flowing. There is no need to accelerate if you need to break again in a few seconds.