• @boeman
    link
    889 months ago

    This feels weird to say… I really think Microsoft should’ve stuck with trident / edgehtml.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      239 months ago

      Why? Because you liked the greater browser diversity or because you think it made a better browser?

      • @boeman
        link
        269 months ago

        Diversity. MS had made great strides with EdgeHTML, but it was still pretty bad

        But at least opening the browser didn’t take all my ram.

        • Daniel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          109 months ago

          And also at the very least you had another option. Which, in my opinion, wasn’t that bad, at least it could’ve been if they just gave up on Bing and MSN.

          • @boeman
            link
            29 months ago

            No way, they can’t give up on bing. They do that and all we have is Google for searches. We need the competition. For MSN, it’s all about content now, I kinda like that branding… It makes it easier to see that I don’t want to see it.

            • Daniel
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Microsoft could host their on SearXNG instance. /s

    • Zeragamba
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      As a web developer, EdgeHTML was the source of so many bugs, including a few that were regressions, and it didn’t seem like Microsoft dedicated enough resources to the Edge project.