So, I make these posts now n again, now on Lemmy a couple times where I make myself as stupid as I can make myself, clearly stating premises and open many avenues of approach for even a novice writer and thinker to enter into a debate with me. Even on a supposed debate community, I can’t get anyone to debate me. Let’s make this real simple.
Premise: God is real
Definition of God: an independent phenomenon likened to a unified field of consciousness that emerges from the properties of “emptiness” to then fold in and on itself across eleven dimensions to form a topological matrix that acts as a monadic nodal communication system
Explain like I’m five version: God is a big balloon of consciousness that made itself into a complex balloon animal, and each of us is one of the sections that communicate with each other
Definition of emptiness: the null that can be implicit (nothingness/0) or explicit (fullness/1) that manifests all phenomequalia
Definition of topology: the math behind intersecting dimensional space; knots/entanglements
Definition of monad: the pocket of consciousness you are; you are not a featherless biped, you are a pocket of consciousness (everything you experience is self-contained within your neurons, yea? And you’re experiencing the “outside” of you, right? So all that “outside” is actually inside you)
I don’t know what else I need to say to start this. Perhaps I’m just retarded.
Axiomatic systems can be defined by the entanglements of a topological matrix, which includes möbiation of entire systems, therefore Gödel was incomplete in his assumptions.
Nice word salad. I’ll take an iced tea with that please.
👍