Ken27238 to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agoPoor guyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up11.63Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.61Karrow-down1imagePoor guyi.imgur.comKen27238 to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-squareExcellinkfedilink28•1 year agoSo you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoI bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
minus-square@GentooPhysicistlink4•1 year agoI’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilink2•1 year agoFlatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
“It works on my machine”
He said the thing!
Packagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?
As a package maintainer, it’s a lot of fun sometimes!
I bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
I’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
Flatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
Username checks out