The lawyers on both sides of a federal court case in Mississippi were caught using artificial intelligence, a situation where, effectively, generative AI tools were used to argue against each other.

The judge wrote in a blistering sanctions order, that the lawyers wasted the court’s time, and that “in an era of rampant unverified AI usage within the legal field, this case presents a prime example of the risk associated with serving as a rubber-stamp.”

“This case presents the Court with an unusual scenario—attorneys for both litigants engaged in similar sanctionable conduct,” Sharion Aycock, senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Mississippi wrote in a sanctions order. “This court is yet again ‘burdened with addressing AI hallucinations court filings.’”

  • Liana
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Huh, it’s like the Prisoner’s Dilemna, but there’s no benefit for cheating. If both sides don’t use AI, it’s fair. If one side uses it, they lose. If both sides use it, they both lose.

    In the instance where only one side uses it and verifies the information, they might win because they’d be using it as a work multiplier, presuming both sides have equal capabilities.