It’s attempting to streamline its health moderation policies.

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Do flat earthers really hurt anyone though?

        • 520
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Stupid isn’t the same as harmful though. They didn’t ban anti-vax because it was stupid, they banned it because they were putting people at risk. This is more of the same. I don’t get what flatearthers put at risk other than our eyes after rolling them too hard.

            • 520
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Treating all misguided thoughts the same is stupidity in itself. Heavy handedness does not convince people of their errors, it leads them to double down.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            They’re gateways for other more dangerous conspiracy theories and the alt right. Folding Ideas has an excellent vid about it but I don’t have the time to link it now.

            • 520
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              And if we were to censor flat earthers, do you think you’ll get less alt rights from the flat earthers or more?

              Hint: by blocking their speech, you end up giving them first-hand evidence on a key alt-right talking point; that the mainstream censors ideas simply because it doesn’t like them. “It was never about safety, like they said when they went after COVID deniers and anti vaxxers. They went after flat earthers who, even by their standards, aren’t posing any harm.”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Less, because deplatforming works. Disrupting the recruiting pipeline is a great way of reducing the impact of harmful extremist ideologies.

                And flat earth is very much part of the alt-right pipeline. It sets the foundation for distrusting experts, science, and straight up ignoring reality, to then substitute with their own.

                • 520
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Less, because deplatforming works. Disrupting the recruiting pipeline is a great way of reducing the impact of harmful extremist ideologies.

                  Actually it would blow up in your face. Because this move would be completely unprecedented, given how flat earthers are not harmful in and of themselves, such a move would get widespread attention and would be reported on widely.

                  And flat earth is very much part of the alt-right pipeline. It sets the foundation for distrusting experts, science, and straight up ignoring reality, to then substitute with their own.

                  The flat earth society doesn’t set up shit. If you’re joining the flat earth society, the distrust of science and experts is already there.

                  But ok, let’s follow your logic, and while we’re at it, let’s ban churches and any talk of Christianity. After all, the right wing also uses Christianity as a recruitment tool, and Christianity has a long and infamous history of science denial.

                  Hey, why stop there? Let’s also ban mosques and Islam! After all, mosques were used by Muslim extremists to recruit people into terrorist organisations. Truly nothing can go wrong!

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    This crisis of how many people fall for bullshit and stupid shit is unprecedented, and is about to break apart the United States. If it hasn’t already done so.

                    Media has a massive hand to play in this.

                    It will not get better unless something is done about it.

                    …or do you want to see where this road truly leads? Because we are about to find out.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        All pseudoscience is dangerous as it promotes magical thinking and denigrates the importance of critical thinking.

        • 520
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Interesting. So where do you sit on things like religion being discussed online?

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Not sure I follow… Is the implication that religion is magical thinking, and therefore harmful to society? Because if so, I agree.

            If you really are interested in this concept, I highly recommend reading “The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark” by Carl Sagan. In fact, it should be required reading for every adult human.

            He explains why this stuff is harmful way better than I ever could.

            • 520
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              There are always elements of ‘magical thinking’ in our lives. There is a lot that cannot be explained by the logical, such as human behaviour. And sometimes we have these fantasies in our head, even though they are impossible or…out there.

              I guess what I’m trying to say is that on some level, ‘magical thinking’ is innate to all of us and isn’t something that should be discouraged. Obviously it shouldn’t override hard facts but if they do and no one stands to be harmed…just let people be wrong and start on the process of learning.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Again, if you actually care to learn more about this position, I highly recommend reading A Demon-Haunted World by Carl Sagan. Like I said, he does a much better job explaining what I’m attempting to say.

                I’m not talking about people just “being wrong,” and then learning. That isn’t what’s happening.

                And no, magical thinking is not part of everyone’s life, and it absolutely should be discouraged.

                • 520
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  How are we defining magical thinking here? Are we talking about anything illogical or specifically the unironic my-Hogwarts-letter-got-lost-in-the-post types?

                  I’ll definitely give that book a read, thanks for the recommendation.

                  • HausOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    Magical thinking, or superstitious thinking,[1] is the belief that unrelated events are causally connected despite the absence of any plausible causal link between them, particularly as a result of supernatural effects.