Advocates were baffled that the bill didn’t pass, given that it had no public opposition

  • warbond
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    I think we can all agree that the line has to be drawn somewhere, so why not just 18 as a blanket statement?

    • Eat_Your_Paisley
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Because the poster you’re responding to got laid which is the same a marriage

      • bitjunkie
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I mean… we were talking about it? Does that mean 18-year-olds getting married (even to people well over 21) isn’t also stupid? I agree there needs to be a bright line somewhere, and that figuring out exactly where is nuanced. I was just pointing out that this looked like engagement bait.