Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang — whose work helped propel artificial intelligence — is stressing in an Associated Press interview that society has no choice but to change in the advent of AI.
ofc they aren’t very good(both are public companies at the end of the day so they wont be very good,the most they can be is “good”.),but i mean they are much better then Nvidia. (ig?)
and it would be cool if we got RISC-V consumer processors.
That’s the dream, but both Intel and AMD will spend all of their money on ensuring it doesn’t happen.
In this regard Nvidia is actually the least bad of the three. It’s already manufacturing ARM SOCs, and isn’t opposed to RISC-V either, since it’d be theoretically more profitable than ARM. No ARM royalties => more money for Jensen.
Especially with the recent RTX Spark announcement. Nvidia is perfectly willing to invest a lot of resources into ARM, while Intel and AMD are both investing resources into sabotaging it.
ARM isn’t RISC-V of course, but close enough. Many companies investing into ARM invest into RISC-V as well, including ARM giants like Qualcomm, because it only makes sense.
If it wasn’t for the AI bubble, I could consider Nvidia to be better than Intel or AMD overall. I’d still probably buy AMD’s desktop GPUs over Nvidia’s though.
i assume Nvidia never made their own architecture(so they are investing into ARM64/RISC-V) and AMD/intel are investing into x86_64(Intel created x86 and AMD X86_64)
AMD is just as bad. It only looks better, because it doesn’t have the resources to pull of all the crazy shit that Nvidia does.
And so is Intel. There’s no good choice when it comes to dekstop CPUs and GPUs, unfortunately.
ofc they aren’t very good(both are public companies at the end of the day so they wont be very good,the most they can be is “good”.),but i mean they are much better then Nvidia. (ig?)
and it would be cool if we got RISC-V consumer processors.
That’s the dream, but both Intel and AMD will spend all of their money on ensuring it doesn’t happen.
In this regard Nvidia is actually the least bad of the three. It’s already manufacturing ARM SOCs, and isn’t opposed to RISC-V either, since it’d be theoretically more profitable than ARM. No ARM royalties => more money for Jensen.
Especially with the recent RTX Spark announcement. Nvidia is perfectly willing to invest a lot of resources into ARM, while Intel and AMD are both investing resources into sabotaging it.
ARM isn’t RISC-V of course, but close enough. Many companies investing into ARM invest into RISC-V as well, including ARM giants like Qualcomm, because it only makes sense.
If it wasn’t for the AI bubble, I could consider Nvidia to be better than Intel or AMD overall. I’d still probably buy AMD’s desktop GPUs over Nvidia’s though.
i assume Nvidia never made their own architecture(so they are investing into ARM64/RISC-V) and AMD/intel are investing into x86_64(Intel created x86 and AMD X86_64)