@soviettaters to conservative • 1 year agoNew York City Using Brooklyn Parks as Migrant Housingpix11.commessage-square144arrow-up117arrow-down113
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkNew York City Using Brooklyn Parks as Migrant Housingpix11.com@soviettaters to conservative • 1 year agomessage-square144
minus-square10Alinkfedilink-1•1 year agoMaybe, but I’m not sure why that matters. The essence of our dispute here is over whether salvation works reliably for kicking a drug addiction.
minus-squarePizzaManlinkfedilink1•1 year agoIt matters because if “true christian” population is correlated with self reported christian population, which it should be, then self reported christian population should also be inversely correlated with drug addicition. To break it down a little further: (n) “christians” = (n * x) true christians (n) “christians” = inverse (drug addicition) Therefore: “true christians” = inverse (drug addicition) Does that make sense?
minus-square10Alinkfedilink-1•1 year agoYes, that does make sense. If the two are really uncorrelated, then it would appear some people are lying about their faith.
Maybe, but I’m not sure why that matters. The essence of our dispute here is over whether salvation works reliably for kicking a drug addiction.
It matters because if “true christian” population is correlated with self reported christian population, which it should be, then self reported christian population should also be inversely correlated with drug addicition.
To break it down a little further:
(n) “christians” = (n * x) true christians
(n) “christians” = inverse (drug addicition)
Therefore:
Does that make sense?
Yes, that does make sense. If the two are really uncorrelated, then it would appear some people are lying about their faith.