• BitchPeas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Theyre all hypothetical.

    But yeah, tolerance is a virtue. Unless someone’s intolerant, we can’t tolerate that.

    I’m not being funny. Intolerance is the exception and needs to be shamed and destroyed.

    Anyway ultimately, understanding someone’s wrong but giving them their due when it comes to free will is mostly nonsecular jam. Thats where most derive meaning.

    And I’m not even secular jelly about that.

    More simply. If youre taking a test, focus on your own paper. If youre peeking around and someone’s wrong, its their lesson not yours. And you might be fuckin wrong.

    Ok good luck and godspeed.

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unless someone’s intolerant, we can’t tolerate that

      That and the Dutch.

      That paradox is on display in this thread! People are telling me my beliefs would be wrong because my beliefs are that other people’s beliefs are wrong and you’re not allowed to believe that other people’s beliefs are wrong. But what if I only believe their beliefs are wrong because their beliefs discount other beliefs?

      So much easier to ignore the whole lot of it and let people do what they want. I should probably stop replying in this thread now ha. Thanks for the friendly message. Peace!

      • BitchPeas
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I totally get where youre coming from.

        Thats also not really a rebuttal or good faith reply.

        But as youre tired, I reiterate its an emotionally responsible move.

        Hahaha charitable to call me friendly, youre friendly yourself.

        Sweet dreams