Russia said on Monday that Finland’s reversal of its long-standing ban on nuclear weapons requires a response as tensions between NATO and Moscow continue to rise. Finland’s parliament voted on June 17 to lift the ban, which allows the country to receive, transport, and facilitate the movement of nuclear weapons on its territory as part of […]
From News From Antiwar.com via This RSS Feed.
Making a bad analogy isn’t helping your case. All this makes me think is that you have no defense to what I said.
Aren’t you clever to figure out that’s exactly what you sounded like to me!
It makes Russia weaker, and that’s what your democracies want, like in the global South, so these ever benevolent democracies can plunder the East like they have the South, all for… Less breadcrumbs for the people and more for the techbros. But at least cars can be fueled for a reasonable price and device storage will come down! Maybe. 🤔 All on the backs of the working people Westerners only bother to care about if it makes oligharch-controlled news often enough. But sure, feel clever, I guess.
Fascist Russia is the only country in the area on an imperialistic rampage expanding their borders, after doing the same thing decades ago.
Europe needs to protect itself against Russia, Russia doesn’t need to do shit except stop being horrible people.
And how does it make Russia weaker?
How does it make any the NATO states weaker to honor their promises?
This is a waste of time. I’ve already conceded that they should have honored the promises. You can’t even make a minor defense of how breaking them actually affects Russia though. All you can do is try to point blame at others.
And you act like NATO is an invading force/county. These counties WANT to join NATO because of how Russia has been acting.
You sound like zionists sound, defending the indefensible. You’re crafty and disingenuous, and you know it.
A promise is an agreement. BOTH SIDES have to fulfill the agreement.
Yes. Russia kept theirs.