• MasterBlaster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh don’t get me wrong I agree with it in principle for that circumstance. The problem is these things never stay in those conditions. Utilization creeps. It starts with let’s protect the children let’s protect the innocent, and pretty soon nobody can do what they want anymore.

    Besides, that’s what the laws are for and they should have their license revoked or they go to jail.

    Put another way, as Ben Franklin once said, those who would trade freedom for safety deserve neither.

    • Leviathan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This particular case seems to me like putting a breathalyzer in an impaired driver’s car. These aren’t toys, they’re dangerous machines that we’re doing nothing about being built more dangerous by the year. If someone egregiously breaks the law and gets a limiter as punishment I’m okay with it like I’m okay with a breathalyzer.