• remote_control_conor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    21 days ago

    My guess is that you don’t hook viewers, emotionally engage and capture their investment in the plot and characters by producing 8-10 episodes. Shows used to do ~24.

    If I spend less time with your character while you’ve got my attention at the start, the connection will more quickly fade away and when it comes to season 2 I have forgotten caring.

    Exceptional exceptions excepted.

    • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      My guess is that you don’t hook viewers, emotionally engage and capture their investment in the plot and characters by producing 8-10 episodes. Shows used to do ~24.

      Some of the best shows going are between 8-10 episodes a season though. And it’s not as if any competitor of netflix now is doing 24 episodes a season. That’s mostly exclusively reserved for network procedurals.

      • remote_control_conor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        All of the shows “going” are that length these days. That means that the best ones have to be that length and that’s survivor bias I think. Just because some shows that length survive doesn’t mean a majority will.

        • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          Most shows have always failed though. Including the old long-form 24 episode shows that got cancelled all the time.

          • remote_control_conor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 days ago

            Yeah. But an investment in a longer season is more likely to translate to sustained viewership for subsequent seasons. There was also less choice in the past. But really I think it’s about emotional investment.

            • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              The less choice here is key. People were more likely to be focusing on one or two TV shows at once because there were simply less TV shows being made. That’s all gone now. There’s far more competition for people’s interest now across the board. There also was much less international options too. Lost was not competing with Korean or Spanish or German shows for people’s attention.

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m routinely emotionally engaged by 90 to 120 minute films. If a show can’t manage it in ten episodes, it’s just not a very good show.

      • remote_control_conor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Emotionally engaged for that 90-120 minutes. Most people would not be invested enough to watch a season about the same character 2 years later. It’s an entirely different proposition and different mode.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      American shows always used to have crazy long series of mostly filler episodes. Dunno how anyone could ever be bothered actually following them.