Why YSK?

The first person who typed “should of” probably heard of it in real life that was meant to be “should’ve”, they typed “should of” online and readers thought that it’s grammatically correct to say “should of” which is in fact wrong and it became widespread throughout the years on Reddit.

I hope something could start to change.

  • @FreedomOfExpressionEnglish
    3•2 years ago

    “Should of” is grammatically incorrect, regardless of whether the user/speaker is aware of its incorrectness. It’s a fact, and a fact per se cannot be misleading. It’s as simple as that. Linguistic conventions, as you’ve illustrated, can be formed over time, but that again doesn’t take away from the fact that such usage is grammatically incorrect to begin with.

    • @[email protected]English
      -1•2 years ago

      Just read the second (or the first, but that is more technical) link I shared. Some native speakers do in fact seem to say “should of” even when the “of” is stressed, so in their dialect it would be grammatical.

      • @[email protected]English
        2•2 years ago

        Some native speakers do in fact seem to say “should of” even when the “of” is stressed, so

        … they are wrong.

        It’s okay for an entire region to be wrong. Look up “how the Southern States were generally super racist” and see how pervasive wrongness can be and still be wrong.