• GeneralEmergency
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because someone not charged with terrorism isn’t being called a terrorist?

        Also the article and headline mention the threats to children and the school.

          • GeneralEmergency
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Technically no.

            Read the article.

            It’s owning terrorist material, and owning explosives.

            Whether you agree with those charges or not. Complaining about Sky’s reporting is missing the forests for the trees.

                  • GeneralEmergency
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    29 days ago

                    So the image you just posted was AI generated.

                    (On a serious note. Being charged with owning terrorist material isn’t the same as being charged as a terrorist. The same way owning vinegar and bleach doesn’t mean you’re going to be making chemical weapons. ( Yeah you could charge someone with it if they used it as a weapon, but just owning them doesn’t mean you’re making chemical weapons))

                    If you want a less heavy example of this same sort of thing. Look up the phrase “tired and emotional”