• FinjaminPoach
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Nope, that makes perfect sense to me without which that or who.

    “Washington cats florida rats chase annoy vegas whores”

    1. The washington cats 2. Which florida rats chase 3. They annoy vegas whores

    It’s a question of where you put pauses and intonation, when sounding it out in your head (or to another person). If you read it monotone it makes little sense. Unfortunately, knowing how its said requires deciphering it first. A lot of english novels have stuff like this, you’ll probably find - you have to read sentences twice to understand what it means

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think you proved my point. You needed to add the word “which”. A pause makes the first part sound like a list.

      • FinjaminPoach
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s probably no way for me to prove to you that it makes sense to me, unless you learn how to make sense of it yourself. I mentioned “which” and “they” because, as an english speaker knowing context about cats and rats, i can infer what connective could go there, but i don’t need it because without the connectives we get a more colloquial informal way of saying it all.

        Is english your first language or is something else ?

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Are you saying the following sentence is perfectly fine English?

          Quaterback Love Greenbay Packers drafted, played Detroit Lions.

          No. It’s missing at least one word.