• Hapankaali
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They were held after the war ended, once the Nazis surrendered.

    Obviously there can be no “Nuremberg-style” trials of Russian war criminals unless they actually lose the war, or after regime change in Russia.

    • YabbaDabbaDipshit
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      So whats the netherlands doing to exacerbate russias loss besides strong words?

      Anything recent that other countries haven’t exceeded?

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So whats the netherlands doing to exacerbate russias loss besides strong words?

        Delivering artillery, tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, ammunition, air defense systems, radar systems, money, etc.

        So what I understand from your reasoning, reading all your comments, is that a country is not allowed to offer war crime tribunals after a war, unless they did enough in that war themselves according to your standards? Could you elaborate your reasoning?

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ohhh what was that again 500mil total over years!?

            Actually, 7.66 billion between januari 2022 and April 2025. After the UK and Germany The Netherlands is the third most contributing country in Europe, according to Zelenskyy.

            Lmfao that’s crazy work to assume you can hold anyone accountable for anything while doing the bare minimum.

            The judicial system doesn’t work like that. A judge shouldn’t be a part of the conflict when they hold a tribunal. A tribunal is a way to hold war criminals accountable for their war crimes. It’s the task of the judicial system to judge based on the facts of these crimes, not on the contribution of the judges themselves.

            I am wondering, where are you from and what is your part in this whole conflict which makes you so hateful towards parties speaking out against Russian war crimes and willing to hold them accountable?

            • YabbaDabbaDipshit
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              Uh okay so basically nothing.

              Wowzers let me drop to my knees and start deepthroating the netherlands for doing… checks notes a fraction of other countries while attempting to be the ones to hold anyone accountable while again…doing the bare minimum.

              I’m all for Russias downfall what I am against is people who’ve done the bare minimum attempting to seem like saviors.

              This isn’t the 1940s. All they’re doing is posturing.

              You wanna bolster your people do it in a meaningful way. This isn’t it. It’s feigning goodness and if they really cared they’d do more. Like I said, do better or shut the fuck up.

      • Hapankaali
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think you already know the answer to your disingenuous question, which in any case has little to do with the willingness to host a trial.