Ok so we get to the crux of the issue here. Is everything any NATO member state does, NATO activity? Do bilateral relationships not exist?
Italy and the UK let America use their bases because America have bases in Italy and the UK. Is everything America does that involves any ally that is also part of NATO, automatically NATO activity?
The one which invaded Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and is now bombing Iran?
And spare me the nonsense https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-mark-rutte-italy-us-bases-iran-war/
What’s that to do with NATO precisely?
Take a moment to pause and think why the head of NATO is saying that the US used NATO bases and NATO supply chain.
Or maybe this will help
He didn’t. He said they used Italian bases…
Italian bases. Which are part of? …
Ok so we get to the crux of the issue here. Is everything any NATO member state does, NATO activity? Do bilateral relationships not exist?
Italy and the UK let America use their bases because America have bases in Italy and the UK. Is everything America does that involves any ally that is also part of NATO, automatically NATO activity?
And the NATO chief announces it. And the supply chain is managed through NATO…
Hey you are starting to get it!
The NATO chief reported on it. Was it a NATO mission or a US mission?
Why did the NATO chief report on it? How did he have the information?