cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/62988948

A woman who dated Maine U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner says he forced her to have sex with him nearly five years ago despite her repeated objections, an allegation Platner denies.

The woman, a 41-year-old Maine resident named Jenny Racicot, detailed the alleged incident to POLITICO in three interviews over the past two weeks. POLITICO also spoke with a man Racicot dated and confided in the years after the alleged incident, and reviewed documents, including emails between Racicot and her therapist and messages between Racicot and an acquaintance whom she warned against getting involved with Platner years before he ran for office.

Racicot said she had an on-and-off relationship with Platner, who is now the Democratic Senate nominee in Maine, for more than two years before he entered her rural Maine home uninvited one night in late 2021, deeply intoxicated, and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. She said she cut off contact with him after telling him the encounter was not consensual.

“I remember him grabbing my pelvis and being really forceful of me,” she said. “I remember the specific moment where I thought to myself, like, ‘This is no longer my choice.’”

  • NM_Gringo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    So that makes it okay to bring it up years later when it’s politically convenient for people supporting an actual known, documented pedophile? No double standards here.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      And how are you any different from the people supporting Trump? You’re as willing to downplay your guy’s sexual predation as they are theirs?

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dunno man. Does rape sound like the kind of thing a war criminal would do?
        I’ll take my answer off the air.

      • NM_Gringo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why are there two standards? One for Democrats, one for Republicans. Paxton got caught IRL with a new mistress. But somehow that’s less significant than an incident that happened years ago that’s pretty sketchy in both circumstance and timing. I’m not overlooking or excusing anything he’s done but how does that inform on how he’d do his job? This is bullshit and this is how the billionaires win.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why are there two standards?

          Yes, that’s my point, you’re not different to Trump supporters.

          I’m not overlooking or excusing anything he’s done

          You very obviously are

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              Whether it’s natural or because you’re being paid is unknown.

              Yeah man, I’m being paid to disagree with you online, you narcissistic dumbass

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’re working hard in these comments to break down any standards the left claimed to have.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a world of difference between SA and having a mistress. Either way, there aren’t “two standards,” the standard should be to not be a sex offender like Platner.

    • yonderbarn@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Both are bad. It doesn’t matter when an assault is revealed but whether it is credible, and the consensus is that it is.