• TropicalDingdong
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean I would guess it’s for energy density not environmental savings of any kind.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I would guess it’s because it’s likely very low cost and easy to build, but there are obvious environmental savings that fall out of it naturally.

      • TropicalDingdong
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        savings that fall out of it naturally.

        sigh… Buh dim tish.

        On the topic, I really doubt it’s about savings at this scale, which is very much proof of concept. I mean it could be but at this stage it’s more important to show it’s potential. And for some thing that’s gonna run for thousands of cycles…