“OpenAI said GPT-5.6 is a major step forward for health intelligence, highlighting that Luna at lowest effort beats GPT-5.5 at highest effort while costing 25× less. Karan Singhal added that, in blinded physician comparisons over 20,000 axis ratings, physicians found fewer flaws in GPT-5.6 responses than physician-written responses across a hard task set.”
Silicon Valley is obsessed with changing the world, except I often think Silicon Valley’s biggest effects are mostly second-order and unintended. I suspect AI medicine will be a great example of that. Silicon Valley players dream of the chance to be multi-billion dollar revenue unicorns; meanwhile, all the real action is happening elsewhere ……
Don’t think so?
Here are two facts for you.
-
All the leading AI models are only months ahead of the open-source AI that is free to use and own. Medical AI with “fewer flaws than physician-written responses” - will be free & globally available by 2027.
-
66% of the Global South owns a smartphone. This means they can directly access AI.
Free Open-Source AI has been setting the standards, and it’s likely to do so in medical AI, too. Furthermore, it won’t just set the standards; it will be the gold standard.
While I’m firmly in the camp of “AI can be a useful tool”, I’d put as much trust in AI with my medical care as I do in a dead donkey’s ability to perform multi-variable calculus. Especially with the “news” seeming to be from some AI driven roundup of twitter shit.
Funny enough, I’ve actually seen my doctor try to use an AI model to help her with deciding on a medication for me. Se wanted a medication with rather specific properties, had one in mind, but wanted to get other options. She knew the side effects of the one she was thinking of might be an issue. The AI failed to come up even with the one she had thought of already. So, good idea, but the execution is still lacking. And that was basically just a glorified medication search engine.