I got a place on the 512GB with Controller list, and got an email a few days after they started. I ordered it on Friday the 3rd and got it today on Thursday the 9th. The tracking codes were all over the place and gave different estimates depending which branch of each company I used. Steam claimed it was shipped when the courier said they hadn’t got it so I was worried for a few days. But this morning Royal Mail (UK customer) sent me an email saying it would arrive today, while GLS said it would arrive tomorrow.

Safe to say I’m happy to have it now and be playing games!

  • auzy1
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Again, as much as I’d like scalping to be banned, things don’t work that way.

      • auzy1
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah… Ok… Let me know how that law will work exactly (provide some wording) that doesn’t also screw over people inadvertently.

        Also, it would have to implemented worldwide instantaneously, or any region not included will exploit their advantage

        • bitjunkie
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          This is a “no true Scotsman” argument. Name one law in the history of government that didn’t have potential for loopholes.

          • auzy1
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            write an example

            There is no clean and good way to write this law imho

            When I say loopholes, I mean ones that further harm people affected by scalpers. It’s easy to say “oh, we’ll write a law”. The problem is writing one that doesn’t backfire completely.

            • bitjunkie
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Which is the problem with every law. If the caveat you’re pointing out is inherent to the system in which the solution is being proposed, it’s not a reason in itself not to try to improve things. You’re letting perfection get in the way of progress. I won’t write a fake law to satisfy some BS internet litmus test, precisely because I’m not a lawmaker. That doesn’t invalidate my opinion that this is a problem that should be solved. It also doesn’t keep Valve from putting some kind of anti-scalping clause in their terms and suing the shit out of people who violate it, which again, is civil law and has absolutely nothing to do with the hypothetical criminal law you’re asking for.

      • auzy1
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Feel free to provide an example law.

        Because, such a law would have to be world-wide, and require a whole new framework to work, or people in countries without the law will abuse their position