@firefox STOP. UPDATING.
The browser was done TEN YEARS AGO. There is literally ZERO FUCKING JUSTIFICATION for you pushing updates EVERY GODDAMN DAY.
Fucking KNOCK IT OFF. WE DON’T WANT YOUR AI FUCKING GARBAGE.
This is why you’re losing to a fucking fork.
You were supposed to be defenders of the faith, not fucking corporate whore sellouts like Google.
Where/how am I doing that?
I understand that ML is to LLM what a motor is to a car. They are not the same, but one is a piece of the other. I dont believe I’ve ever conflated those terms. I am trying to specifically draw that distinction, in fact.
I can’t tell if you’re trying to persuade me, convince others,or are simply trying to shout so I can’t be heard. Youre telling me to stop doing something I dont believe I ever started, but are not saying what that is in a way that I can decipher.
@badgermurphy you’re in a thread about AI in Firefox and uneccesary updates to push that garbage. I think YOU are the one who is trying to change the discussion. We’re talking about LLMs and consent and security. No one gives a fuck that your argument is “there are special use cases where LLMs are really cool!”
No. There are not.
I dont understand. I didn’t say you were changing the discussion and I didn’t say LLMs are good. I noted that they were used to find exploits in Firefox, many of which were confirmed to be true. I didn’t make a value judgment on whether using that tool was good. If I had, I would have said that it is not worth burning down the planet to write more secure code.
That said, they already did it. It would be even more of a waste if we disregarded the one small good that came out of it. I’m saying that we now know for a fact things that are not done about Firefox, that’s it. If you look at my words, I didn’t make the claims youre saying, and you are reading them into my words, presumably due to assumptions you’ve made about my opinion, which I assure you are also untrue.