• Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Of course not. But the definition of death you gave, doesn’t distinguish between forms of life.

          • stephan262
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The conversation is about human death. The question is at what point is a human being considered dead. If cellular function is brought into it, then a rotting corpse is teeming with bacterial life.

            You are right that biological functions of the human body can continue well past the point that someone would be broadly considered dead. I just think that a lack of brain function is a good classification of when to consider that someone has died.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              The conversation is about what makes a “corpse”.
              If the brain dead body still performs the majority of its biological functions, that’s not really a corpse.

      • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah the current definition pretty much says a lot of dead stuff together is making one living being