So yes, people are different. You don’t have to agree on anyone to have your own opinions and defend it. It’s the same with moral. Don’t you have any? Because you don’t trust yourself? Dude you’re allowed to speak up for yourself and others, just like everyone else.
You don’t have to agree on anyone to have your own opinions and defend it.
That’s very different than taking sadistic delight at their suffering.
Dude you’re allowed to speak up for yourself and others, just like everyone else.
Setting aside the fact that you’re generally not allowed, either by social convention or strict censorship policies? Just being loudly in opposition isn’t the same as being justice-minded.
So yes, people are different. You don’t have to agree on anyone to have your own opinions and defend it. It’s the same with moral. Don’t you have any? Because you don’t trust yourself? Dude you’re allowed to speak up for yourself and others, just like everyone else.
That’s very different than taking sadistic delight at their suffering.
Setting aside the fact that you’re generally not allowed, either by social convention or strict censorship policies? Just being loudly in opposition isn’t the same as being justice-minded.
?
What is moral for you, what is you ethos based on, if not on a feeling of wrong and right? Are you saying you are a computer?
You are, people will even listen if you’re not only always being loudly.
Morality exists, get over it lol
There is a difference between having a sense of justice and wanting a feeling of vengance.
When you’re in a loud room, you must shout to be heard. And if you’re gagged in a loud room, nobody is hearing you regardless of your speaking savvy.
Who are you actually accusing right now?
That’s not really a conversation. Bye
🙄
did you not realize what comm youre on?
I think you might be lumping neurotypical “sense of justice” with the type we expeierence.
Are we applying biological essentialism to justice?