A group of former officials with the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice is asking a federal judge to scrutinize a controversial deal that granted President Donald Trump and his family sweeping immunity from past tax audits.

They alleged that the deal to resolve Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax documents in exchange for immunity from past audits was “unprecedented and breathtakingly improper.”

    • Triumph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Dammit, you’re right. Federal judge ruled that the two parties in the suit were not separate entities, but did not nullify any portion of the settlement.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes it did. It all goes away, and the lawyers may lose their licenses. There is no settlement, because there was no case, and lawyers are likely to be sanctioned over it, and possibly lose their licenses (they won’t, but they’ll sweat it out for a while).

        The slush fund and the immunity deal are officially dead. Now we should investigate how this all happened, who made the decision to actually attempt this ridiculous operation, and put them in prison.

      • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The ruling explicitly says that the settlement never had any legal standing. There is nothing to nullify.