• mlg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not really a lie but I’m surprised how little they covered major international events, especially wars like WWI/WWII/Korea/Vietnam, etc.

    All of them were basically a 3 paragraph maximum excerpt before you went back to reading about some random local policy or societal change that didn’t really matter in the grand scheme of things.

    Biggest lie though was teaching kids that secondary sources like news publishers were reliable sources of information lol. NYT and the Washington Post sucked a long time before the internet. WP especially was just straight Imperialist propaganda sometimes.

    Just because they’re not a primary source doesn’t mean they can’t be biased or reporting false information.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not really a lie but I’m surprised how little they covered major international events, especially wars like WWI/WWII/Korea/Vietnam, etc.

      Is this in the US?

      Because the version I learned about in my indoctrination American education was a lot of this was covered, but on a extremely Pro-american slant. Like literally everyone was struggling until America stepped in and stopped the Nazis, communists, etc. Even the narrative around the Vietnam war was that it was Americans helping the poor struggling citizens of Vietnam.

      • mlg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I’m guessing the more liberalized history books chose to just omit it as opposed to justifying it.